Legal Opinion

State v. Fairfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1931No. 22823. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullertor, J.

The appellant, Max Fairfield, was charged, with another, by an information filed in the superior court of Snohomish county, with a violation of certain sections of the statutes relating to intoxicating liquors. The information contained five counts. The jury convicted the appellant on three of the counts, and acquitted him on the other two. From the judgment of conviction, he appeals.

• The information, omitting the formal allegations and the counts upon which the appellant was acquitted, reads as follows:

“Count I: They, the said Max Fairfield and Judd Spalsbury, in the county of Snohomish,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PeckWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. QuinnWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. HarstedWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. HarrasWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. HilstadWashington Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. State v. TranchellWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API