Legal Opinion

United States of America ex rel, Brooks v. Wells Fargo & Company, NA

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 12, 2019No. 1:17-cv-01237Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ex rel, DeVontae Brooks, ) Appearing QUI TAM, ) ) Plaintiff/Relator, ) ) Case No. 17-cv-1237 v. ) ) Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman WELLS FARGO BANK N.A, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff/relator DeVontae Brooks brings this qui tam action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) against defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. Specifically, Brooks alleges that Wells Fargo submitted fraudulent claims, gave false statements, and committed unlawful retaliation in violation of 31…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States Ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Lewis Borsellino and I.M. Acquisitions, LLC v. Goldman Sachs Group, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. United States Ex Rel. Lusby v. Rolls-Royce Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API