Ahmad Abu Elreich v. Waymo, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AHMAD ABU ELREICH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00814 JLT SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING 13 v. MOTION TO FILE EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF OBJECTIONS; GRANTING 14 DEFENDANT UBER’S MOTION TO WAYMO, LLC and UBER DISMISS AND DENYING DEFENDANT 15 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., WAYMO’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT 16 Defendants. (Docs. 33, 36, 37, 73) 17 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 Ahmad Abu Elreich is the named inventor and owner of
U.S. Patent No. 11,577,691
(the 21 “’691 Patent”). He brings the instant…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Javiad Akhtar v. J. MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Robert M. Schucker v. Terry G. Rockwood James C. Fukuhara Dewar, Romig & Rockwood, Inc. Anne D. McGowan Delay, Laredo & McGowan Maurice JourdaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Sean HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Berkheimer v. Hp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.