Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 5, 1953No. 311-52PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

The plaintiff, a retired naval officer, sues to recover the difference between the retired pay actually received by him as a Lieutenant Commander on the Naval Reserve Retired List during the period of November 1, 1950, to March 6, 1951, computed on the basis of 32.41 percent of his active duty pay at the time of his retirement, pursuant to the provisions of Title III of the Army and Air Force Vitalization and Retirement Equalization Act of June 29, 1948, as amended, 62 Stat. 1081, 1087; 34 U. S. C. §§ 440i, 440j, and retired pay computed on the basis of 75 percent of active duty pay under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Le BrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Berry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  2. Perry v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1970
  3. Abbott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. William O. Perry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. GuthrieUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API