Legal Opinion

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Gilstrap

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1908No. 15,357PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Rice district court; Jermain W. Brinckerhoff, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This action was brought to recover damages for failure to deliver a telegram. The jury returned a verdict allowing $770.52 damages, and judgment was rendered thereon, which the defendant by this proceeding in error seeks to reverse.

The telegram in question was sent from Neosho, Mo., and reads as follows:

“To Henry Gilstrap, Lyons, Kan.:
“Father very sick, come if can.. John Sayers.”

It was received at Lyons, Kan., at 9:28 in the forenoon of June 7, 1906. It was not actually delivered until 2:25 in the afternoon of the following day. The sender…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LawsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Nitka v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Bailey v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BodkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API