Legal Opinion
Ross v. Paddy
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided May 26, 2000No. 3135PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
After careful consideration of the Petition for Rehearing, the Court is unable to discover any material fact or principle of law that has been either overlooked or disregarded and, hence, there is no basis for granting a rehearing. It is, therefore, ordered that the Petition for Rehearing be denied. However, Opinion Number 3135, filed March 20, 2000, is withdrawn and the attached opinion is substituted.
HOWARD, Judge:
Donald Ross brought this negligence action against Roland Paddy, d/b/a Paddy-Son Development Company, Inc. (“Paddy”), for injuries allegedly…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Skaggs v. Elk Run Coal Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Nelson v. Concrete Supply CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Glenridge Unit Owners Assn. v. FeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Oliver v. Columbia, Newberry & Laurens R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
- Wheeler v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- Okatie River, L.L.C. v. Southeastern Site Prep, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Fairchild v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Hurd v. Williamsburg CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Ex Parte AnonymousSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Gadson Ex Rel. Gadson v. ECO Services of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.