Legal Opinion

Chaverst v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 10, 1987PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the denial of a pro se petition for writ of error coram nobis. The appellant alleges therein that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to interview two witnesses whose names were given to him by the appellant. He further states that his counsel failed to appeal his conviction to this Court even after the appellant expressed his desire to appeal.

The State did not respond to the allegations of the appellant. Therefore, "the unrefuted facts set out by the petitioner must be taken as true." Ex parte Floyd,457 So.2d 961, 962 (Ala. 1984);…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. Acra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  5. Ex Parte Hodges, 1100112 (Ala. 8-26-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API