Ellis v. Sinclair Refining Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
Tbe decisions of this Court are all in accord that in order to establish actionable negligence it must appear: First, that tbe defendant has failed to exercise proper care in tbe performance of some legal duty which tbe defendant owed tbe plaintiff under tbe circumstances in which they were placed, proper care being that degree of care which a prudent man should use under like circumstances when charged with a like duty; and, second, that such negligent breach of duty was tbe proximate cause of tbe injury. It must not only appear that tbe negligent act produced tbe result in continuous…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Money v. . Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Clark v. Cleveland Drug Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Wood Ex Rel. Putnam v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Hall v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Holderfield v. Rummage Bros. Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.