United States v. Nesmith
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
The question presented on this motion is whether it constitutes a violation of the privilege against self-incrimination for the Government to introduce in evidence in a criminal case the chemical analysis of a urine specimen furnished by the defendant in compliance with a request or direction of a law enforcement officer. This subject is of growing importance because of the increasing use of scientific tests in criminal prosecutions.
This case comes before the court on a motion by the defendant to suppress evidence. The defendant has been indicted on a charge of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- United States v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. RidlingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1972
- Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Mack Daniel and Ab Daniel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- People v. ConternoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.