Hoover, Inc. v. Metro Board of Zoning Appeals
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEWIS, Judge.
This is an appeal by petitioner/appellant, Hoover Inc. (“Hoover”), from an order of the chancery court affirming the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeal’s decision to deny Hoover’s application for a conditional use permit.
The pertinent facts are as follows. On 23 April 1992, Hoover filed an application for a conditional use permit with the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals (“the Board”). Hoover wanted the permit in order to build a stone processing plant and related plants at 6682 Nolensville Road. 1 To aid it in its decision, the Board asked for comments from various…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watts v. Civil Service Board for ColumbiaTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
- Mayor of Baltimore v. BiermannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Brooks v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- Lobelville Special School District v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- 421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Moore & Associates, Inc. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Robinson v. ClementCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Hoover, Inc. v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- Harding Academy v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.