Legal Opinion

Hoover, Inc. v. Metro Board of Zoning Appeals

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 5, 1996PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

This is an appeal by petitioner/appellant, Hoover Inc. (“Hoover”), from an order of the chancery court affirming the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeal’s decision to deny Hoover’s application for a conditional use permit.

The pertinent facts are as follows. On 23 April 1992, Hoover filed an application for a conditional use permit with the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals (“the Board”). Hoover wanted the permit in order to build a stone processing plant and related plants at 6682 Nolensville Road. 1 To aid it in its decision, the Board asked for comments from various…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watts v. Civil Service Board for ColumbiaTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. BiermannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Brooks v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. Lobelville Special School District v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. 421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Moore & Associates, Inc. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  3. Robinson v. ClementCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  4. Hoover, Inc. v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. Harding Academy v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API