Legal Opinion

South Carolina National Bank v. Lake City State Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 20, 1965No. 18381PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice.. This action is a sequel to an action by W. Wesley Singletary & Son, Inc. (Singletary) against Lake City State Bank (Lake City) to which we first refer.

Over a period of years, a job foreman employed by Singletary caused checks to be issued o,n padded payroll records and cashed them on forged endorsements at various banks, including The South Carolina National Bank of Charleston. These checks were forwarded to Lake City and charged by it to Singletary’s payroll account. Upon discovery o,f the forgeries, Singletary sued Lake City for the aggregate of these debits. Lake City…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Bourne v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Rivers, Warehouse Commissioner v. Liberty National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Pringle v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. EadesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. South Carolina National Bank v. Lake City State BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API