Legal Opinion
Timken Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 25, 1996No. Slip Op. 96-8. Court No. 93-08-00475PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
This action is before the Court on a motion for judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to Rule 56.2 of this Court. The Timken Company and Republic Engineered Steels Inc. (collectively “plaintiffs”) were the petitioners in the underlying investigation and are United States producers of the like product at issue. Plaintiffs challenge the unanimous negative final determination of the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission” or “ITC”), that the United States industry producing other special quality carbon and alloy hot-rolled bars and cut-length…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- The Timken Company v. The United States, and China National MacHinery and Equipment Import and Export CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Suramerica de Aleaciones Laminadas, C.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cleo Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Gerald Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- PS Chez Sidney, LLC v. United States International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- NEC Corp. v. Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.