Legal Opinion

Foley v. Whelan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1945No. 33,894PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint, which alleges that during the period from March 1, 1938, to August 15, 1943, he lost to defendants by playing coin-operated slot machines kept by them the sum of $20,000, the property of Wilson & Company Employees Credit Union, which would be the beneficiary of any recovery. The action was brought under the provision of § 614.09 (§ 10217), which, so far as here material, provides that the loser may recover from the winner any money lost “by playing at cards, dice, or other game.” See, Nagle v. Randall,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. WeithoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Lyman v. . KurtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. State v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Tatman v. StraderIllinois Supreme Court · 1860

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Gau v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. State v. EndSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Stabs v. City of TowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. State v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API