Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1992No. 268-91PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

We granted review to determine whether Tex.R.Cr.Evid. 611 requires a defendant to preserve and make available to the appellate court business records belonging to and used prior to testifying by an adverse witness to refresh her recollection where the trial court denied his request to examine and motion to produce the records before crossexamining the witness, directing instead that defense counsel proceed with crossexamination. See Young v. State, 803 S.W.2d 335, at 338, 340 (Tex.App — Waco 1990).1 This is an important…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Ballew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Hawkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Powell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. Espinosa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API