Espinosa v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault and his punishment was assessed by a jury at eighteen years in the penitentiary. This conviction was affirmed. Espinoza v. State, 828 S.W.2d 53 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1991). We granted discretionary review to determine whether, under Tex.R.Crim.Evid. 404(b), appellant properly requested that the State give notice of its intent to offer evidence of extraneous offenses and whether the State’s open file policy constituted reasonable notice. We will affirm.
Appellant was charged with…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Kinnamon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991
- Espinoza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Durish v. Panan International, N.V.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
4Cited by84 opinions
- Henderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
- Sauceda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Webb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Saldivar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Chimney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.