In Re: BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1DissentHatchett, Chief Judge
Without the benefit of briefing or clear guidance from the Supreme Court, a majority of this panel sua sponte abandons a firmly rooted line of circuit authority holding that a district court’s statutory-based remand order must be challenged by Petition for Writ of Mandamus. In so doing, the majority (1) contravenes the well-established rule that only the en banc court or the Supreme Court may reverse prior panel decisions; (2) alters the standard of review applicable in this case; and (3) compounds the error of a decision that is otherwise wrong on the merits. For these reasons, I…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Gaming Corporation of America Golden Nickel Casinos, Inc. v. Dorsey & Whitney, a Partnership, in Re Dorsey & Whitney, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- In the Matter of Amoco Petroleum Additives Company and Buck Isbell, in the Matter of Robin A.G. Jackson, an Underwriter at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Richard Roe v. John O'DOnOhueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.