Glenn v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating the case: The essence of what the defendants propose to do, and the ultimate effect of their proposal is, to issue bonds of Durham County to meet a deficiency of $65,000 in the county operating expense fund, which deficiency, without enumerating the several items composing it, was occasioned by the inability of the county authorities to collect or to realize sufficient taxes out of the maximum constitutional levy for said fund. The remedy suggested in French v. Commissioners, 74 N. C., 692, to meet such a situation (elaborated in later cases) is, either to reduce…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Fawcett v. Town of Mt. AirySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Jones v. Commissioners.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Person v. . DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hammond v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Edwards v. . CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874