Legal Opinion

Uhl v. Irwin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the District Court of Payne County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bierer, J.:

George P. Uhl, the plaintiff in error, brought his action in replevin in the district court of Payne county, on the 25th day of February, 1893, to recover six head of horses. It appears that on the 14th day of January, 3893, Eliza Jane Irwin brought an action for divorce in the probate court against her husband, Elorenzo (Lorenzo) Irwin. In her petition she also prayed for a judgment for alimony. On the same day she filed in the probate court her affidavit, setting up, among other things, that the. defendant was threatening to convey away…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rice v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Taylor v. ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. College Corner & Richmond Gravel Road Co. v. MossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Dakan v. DakanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Ames v. AmesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Redcorn v. District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Tank v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API