Legal Opinion

People v. Dolliver

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1986No. Docket Nos. B012192, B016762PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, Acting P. J.

In the process of robbing a jewelry store, appellants Dolliver and Seide confined the store owner, an employee, and a customer to a small bathroom in the store. In a nonjury trial they were found guilty as charged of robbery and two counts of false imprisonment. In addition, each appellant was found to have personally used a firearm and to have suffered two prior felony convictions. Each appellant was sentenced to state prison for fifteen years, consisting of a midterm of three years for robbery, two years for use of a firearm, and five years each for their two prior…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. LloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. People v. ConwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. MesceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API