Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Sadtler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 24, 1959No. 37849PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

1. “In order to render a promissory note a sealed instrument, it must be so recited in the body of the note,. The mere addition of a seal after the signature of the maker is insufficient.” Jackson v. Augusta Southern R. Co., 125 Ga. 801 (54 S. E. 697). The note sued on in this case had no such recital in the body of the instrument, and, accordingly, although the maker’s signature was followed by the word “Seal” the note was a simple contract with a six-year statute of limitations.

2. Allegations contained in an answer cannot be considered in passing on a demurrer to a petition,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin v. BroachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  2. Gartrell v. LinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  3. Bulloch v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  4. Middlebrooks v. CabanissSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Mu Chapter Building Fund Inc. v. HenrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Landmark Engineering, Inc. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Heath v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API