Loomis Fruit Growers' Ass'n v. California Fruit Exchange

In this action the plaintiff had judgment as hereinafter stated, from which judgment the defendant appeals.

(For convenience, the plaintiff will hereafter be referred to as “Association” and the defendant as “Exchange”.)

On the sixth day of July, 1907, an agreement was entered into between the Association as the party of the first part and the Exchange as party of the second part,' for the marketing of deciduous fruits, which agreement, though *267made only for one year, was to run from year to year until notification of cancellation was given by either party to the other prior to the thirty-first…