Legal Opinion

Coulter Property Management, Inc. v. James

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1998No. CC 9305-02944; CA A85455; SC S43732PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This is a landlord-tenant personal injury action. We address two questions on review: First, do the habitability requirements of the 1991 version of the Oregon Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (RLTA), ORS 90.100 et seq. (1991) require that a tenant prove that the landlord knew or should have known of an alleged habitability violation? Both the circuit court and the Court of Appeals concluded that the 1991 RLTA requires proof of actual or constructive knowledge. Coulter Property Management, Inc. v. James, 138 Or App 568, 910 P2d 397 (1996). However, we recently reached the opposite…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Woolston v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bellikka v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merrill v. JansmaWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Eduardo v. Clatsop Community Resource Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Grady v. Cedar Side Inn, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Tucker v. HayfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Waldner v. StephensOregon Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API