Legal Opinion

Borgemeister v. Union Insurance Society of Canton, Ltd.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 1, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

The plaintiffs, to whom loss was payable under a policy of marine insurance issued by the defendant insurance company, sue to recover for alleged damage to part of a shipment of rubber. The rubber was shipped from Singapore to New York on the vessel Kazembe. It was in good condition at the time of shipment, but was found, on arrival at port of. destination, to be damaged. The' damage was caused by water. The parties are not agreed as to whether such water damage was due to exposure to rain prior to loading into the vessel, or to sea spray while on lighters at point of shipment, or to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hazard's Administrator v. New England Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. Cary v. . Home Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Green v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Moses v. Sun Mutual InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852
  5. Perry v. CobbSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. The Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Kermani v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAlbany City Court · 1932
  3. Fine v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1941
  4. Senn Products Corp. v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1943
  5. American Molasses Co. v. RobertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API