Legal Opinion
Gaughan v. Nickoloff
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
George T. Vandermettlbn, Off. Ref.
This is a surplus money proceeding. James and Gary Stevens, infants, owned as record title owners certain real property in the Town of Hamburg. It was sold in a mortgage foreclosure action. There was left over surplus moneys in the amount of $1,500. It is claimed by the *556said infants as record title owners. It is also claimed by George Nickoloff individually and as administrator of the" estate of Agnes Nickoloff. While there was mentioned a .claim of fraud, no evidence to establish it was introduced. The claim of the said infants is based upon a power of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Smith v. KirkpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Porges v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Craighead v. . PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Belfanc v. BelfancAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Bryant v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Cheng Yih-Chun v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Estate of Goldman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1996
- Estate of Casey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.