Legal Opinion

Richfield Nat. Bank of Richfield v. American Surety Co. of New York

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1930No. 8496PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Under the doctrine of subrogation, the appellee American Surety Company, of New York was granted a decree against the appellant for the recovery of a specified sum of money.

The school district, appearing as one of the appellees, had designated the appellant as a depository for a part of its funds. The said surety had become bound under a contract of suretyship’ for the treasurer of said school district. The treasurer defaulted and absconded. The surety duly paid the full amount of his defalcations and sought reimbursement from the appellant upon the grounds that it had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. American Surety Co. v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of RoswellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  4. Chicago & A. Ry. Co. v. New York, L. E. & W. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  5. Webb v. School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. Federal Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. AinsworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Citizens Nat. Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  4. Hodgins v. National Surety Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API