Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1998No. 94-6108PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoggs, J., joined by McKEAGUE, D.J.,
DAUGHTREY, J. (pp. 975-76), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
AMENDED OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has petitioned for enforcement of its order finding respondent, Fluor Daniel, Inc., to have committed various unfair labor practices against job applicants who are also union organizers and against an employee sympathetic to the union involved. The NLRB order imposed various remedial sanctions on Fluor Daniel as a result. We grant the NLRB’s petition for enforcement in part and remand the remaining issues for further consideration in light of our…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mt. Clemens General Hospital v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998