Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Chatham Electronics
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 13, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
70 N.J. Super. 202 (1961)
175 A.2d 256
GLORIA ANDERSON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
CHATHAM ELECTRONICS, DIVISION OF TUNGSOL ELECTRIC COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 9, 1961.
Decided November 13, 1961.
Before Judges GAULKIN, KILKENNY and HERBERT.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Stanley U. Phares, attorney).
Mr. Sidney M. Schreiber argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.
This is a workmen's compensation case.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Farmers Gin Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Fitzgibbons v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Saintsing v. Steinbach CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Bobertz v. Board of Education of Hillside Twp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Department of Correction v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Southern California Rapid Transit District, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- S. Cal. Rapid Transit Dist. v. WORKERS'COMP. APP. BD.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Hendrickson v. George Madsen Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Camp v. Lockheed Electronics, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.