Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Doe

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1999No. 26433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

This ease arises by certified questions from the Circuit Court of Ohio County and presents issues concerning this Court’s decision in Hamric v. Doe, 201 W.Va. 615, 499 S.E.2d 619 (1997). Modifying our prior law, which permitted recovery of uninsured motorist benefits only when an insured could prove that his/her injuries were the result of actual physical contact with a hit-and-run vehicle, we ruled in Hamric that uninsured motorist benefits are recoverable even in the absence of physical contact provided independent third-party evidence establishes that direct physical contact…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perkins v. DoeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Girgis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hamric v. DoeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. LowerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. NormanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elchehimi v. Nationwide Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  2. Mavashev v. Windsor Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Elchehimi v. Nationwide Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API