Legal Opinion

Mora v. Mejias

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided November 3, 1953No. 8426PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ-NAZARIO, District Judge.

I

Plaintiffs have filed a motion requesting that a date be set for the final hearing of their Petition for Permanent Injunction to restrain enforcement of defendant’s Administrative Order No. 228 of March 12, 1953. In their motion plaintiffs state that they do not oppose a motion, previously filed by defendant, requesting that a three judge court be convened to hear and determine the petition under 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2281.

There has been some delay in the decision of the present motion because the court, when the question of a three judge court was first raised, was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Metropolitan Railroad v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok PoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Mora v. MejiasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Rodriguez v. Popular Democratic PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Samuel R. Kaplus and J. Kaplus & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Manuel QuinonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. Ramírez de Ferrer v. Mari BrásSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API