Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Rushmore

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 5, 1934PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lloyd, J.

The question presented is whether a professional man may enter into a special contract at an agreed compensation for attendance as a witness and giving expert testimony upon the facts presented for determination in the trial of a cause.

Plaintiff below was a physician practicing medicine and surgery in Plainfield, and, according to his testimony, was asked to attend at the trial of a case in which the defendant Rushmore and his wife were parties. The doctor had observed the condition of Mrs. Rushmore and his evidence was desired to determine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrus v. PhaneufMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Gordon v. ConleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Imposition of Sanctions in Alt v. ClineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Carney-Hayes Ex Rel. McCormack v. Northwest Wisconsin Home Care, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Walsh v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
  4. Rocco v. NJ Transit Rail OperationsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. Spaulding v. HussainNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API