Heiskell v. Morris
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM SHELBY Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. — J. Allen, Special Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green
These suits were brought by the receiver of the United Investors’ Company, an insolvent Tennessee corporation, to recover from the several defendants unpaid balances on their subscriptions to the capital stock of the corporation. The facts of each case are the same, and they were consolidated and heard together by the chancellor. There was a decree in favor of the complainant, and defendants have appealed.
The United Investors’ Company was organized under the laws of Tennessee for the purpose of dealing in real estate at Memphis. Its capital stock was fixed at $100,000, to be divided into one…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Chubb v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Newton Nat. Bank v. NewbeginCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Anderson v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eastern Products Corporations v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Positype Corp. of America v. MahinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Farmers' Lumber Co. v. LuikartWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Hamby v. FoucheCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
- Mountain View Development Co. v. BurnettTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.