Legal Opinion

Mountain View Development Co. v. Burnett

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

These consolidated eases, three in number, were instituted by the plaintiff, Mountain Yiew Development Company, against the respective defendants, to enforce collection of subscriptions which they made to its capital stock. A petition was circulated among the residents of a particular locality in Knoxville, in January, 1924, soliciting subscriptions for stock in a corporation to be created, which petition is as follows:

“We, the undersigned, hereby subscribe for the amounts of stock, set opposite our respective names, of the Mountain Yiew Development Company, a corporation to be chartered and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Milwaukee Brick & Cement Co. v. SchoknechtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Belton Compress Co. v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Heiskell v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Read v. Memphis Gayoso Gas Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wallace v. DuelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API