Legal Opinion

Dehart v. Lampman (In re Lampman)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 2013No. 1:09-bk-09623-RNOPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION1

POBERT N. OPEL, II, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is the Chapter 13 Trustee’s (“Trustee”) Motion to Reinstate Case (“Motion”) of Arlene Lampman (“Debtor”). The Trustee brings the Motion on the grounds of alleged bad-faith conduct on the part of the Debtor during the pendency of her case. For the reasons stated herein, the Motion is denied.

I. JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

George and Arlene Lampman filed their voluntary petition…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Woodworker's Supply, Inc. v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re MarinariUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Asarkakasaamsu v. FirstBank Puerto RicoDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2020
  3. Group Management Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022
  4. In re: Mersad RahmanovicUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API