Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1931No. 3916PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the case as above).

By assignments of error Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the complaint is made of peremptorily instructing the jury to return the verdict in favor of the city of Dallas permanently “enjoining the defendants, the School Board of Cement City Independent School District, from further participation in the school affairs of said district.” It is pointed out that the legal existence of the Cement City independent school district was never dissolved nor abandoned, and the plaintiffs in error in their capacity of school trustees and as taxpaying inhabitants were authorized to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Kuhn v. City of YoakumTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. School Directors of Union School District v. School Directors of New Union School DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Stephens v. Buie, County JudgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. City of Dallas v. SpringerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Beyer v. Templeton, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. McKee v. City of Mt. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Hunt v. Merchandise Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Williams v. City of Tom Bean, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  5. Bell v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API