Markham v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Action to review order of the State Industrial Commission, making an additional award to L. A. Mulholland, as claimant under the Workmen’s Compensation Act; J. H. Markham, Jr., respondent, and Commercial Underwriters, insurance carriers, as petitioners, bringing the action.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the State Industrial Commission made on May 14, 1921, allowing L. A. Mul-holland, as claimant, additional compensation over and above the compensation allowed said claimant under an order of the State Industrial Commission made July 28, 1917, and reviewing said order of 1917. From this order the petitioners, J. H. Markham, Jr., and Commercial Underwriters appeal. The State Industrial Commission and L. A. Mulholland appear here as respondents.
The order appealed from discloses the facts upon which the claimant bases his claim for the additional allowance,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Saunders v. New England Collapsible Tube Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Herbert v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Reimers v. Proctor Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cameron Coal Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Consolidated Fuel Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- J. B. Klein Iron & Foundry Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Little Fay Oil Co. v. StanleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Associated Employers' Reciprocal v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.