Reimers v. Proctor Publishing Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On certiorari to Hudson Picas.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation act taken by the father of the decedent, an unmarried man. Yo executor or administrator qualified. We see no objection to the father initiating the proceeding. Pamph. L. 1911, p. 142, pi. 19.
The principal question in the ease for us is whether there was evidence justifying an inference that the death was by accident arising out of and in the course of the employment. There was evidence justifying an inference that the decedent was employed by the defendant as a general utility man, and…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Enfield v. the Certain-Teed Prod. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Twin Peaks Canning Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Leonard v. Cranberry Furnace Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Radtke Bros. & Korsch Co. v. RutzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.