Legal Opinion

Clack-Rylee v. Auffarth

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 2005No. A05A0615PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

Jill Clack-Rylee and Charles Rylee sued Bradley Auffarth, M.D. for medical malpractice. The jury returned a defense verdict, which they appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to remove a juror for cause. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

The Rylees argue that juror Conley showed bias, and the court failed to fully explore the bias or allow them to fully explore Conley’s bias. Auffarth responds that the Rylees were allowed to question Conley as long as they wished and that Conley displayed no bias requiring the trial court to further explore the issue.

OCGA §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Chancey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Kim v. WallsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. Doss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Powell v. AminCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API