Legal Opinion

Etts v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 25, 2015No. Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-11588PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt 47)

MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a mortgage foreclosure case. In their second amended complaint, Plaintiffs Troy and Lea Etts accuse Defendants of fraudulent misrepresentation and promissory estoppel based on alleged promises to (i) review Plaintiffs’ financial eligibility for a loan modification and (ii) abstain from conducting a foreclosure sale during the review period, among other things.

Defendants have filed a joint motion to dismiss (Dkt. 47). Plaintiffs filed a response…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Peggy Greenberg and Pamela Rossmann, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. The Life Insurance Company of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Albrecht v. TreonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pittman v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API