Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 22, 1988No. 2 CA-CV 88-0261PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACAGNINA, Chief Judge.
The only issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court correctly applied the one-year statute of limitations, A.R.S. § 12-541(3), to bar the claim of Gail S. Jackson, Max J. Gottschalk and Fred Frye (Jacksons) against Pima County for negligence and negligence per se. We affirm.
FACTS
Jacksons own property adjacent to the Rillito River and to property owned by Edison Realty Associates. In 1979, Edison constructed bank protection for its property with the approval of Pima County pursuant to Pima County Flood Ordinance No. 1974-86. The construction permit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. BettsArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Griffith v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Haws v. FracarolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- Owens v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Sprint Communications Co. v. Western Innovations, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Sprint Communications Company LP v. FNF Construction IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019