Legal Opinion
Humphrey v. Fort Knox Transit Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided January 6, 1945No. 679PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Elmo M. Humphrey, sought by this action damages from the defendant, Fort Knox Transit Company, by reason of injuries alleged to have been received while being discharged as a passenger from one of the busses operated by the defendant over the United States Military Reservation in Fort Knox, Kentucky. The plaintiff was a soldier in the United States Army, stationed at Fort Knox, Kentucky. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,000. The matter is now before the Court upon the defendant’s renewal of its motion for a directed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Realty Holding Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Kelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Mudd v. YarbroughDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
- Seegers v. StrzempekDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
- Bowman v. DuBoseDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
- Ellis v. Southeast Construction CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.