Legal Opinion
Huzenlaub v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 22, 1996No. 90-3272 VPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
Petitioner seeks compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program established pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (“Vaccine Act”) for injuries allegedly suffered as a result of diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccinations. This opinion addresses petitioner’s motion for review of the special master’s August 25, 1995 order dismissing her compensation petition for lack of jurisdiction. Although we find that the court has jurisdiction over petitioner’s claim, we find that she has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Amanda Beck, a Minor, by Her Father, Henry J. Beck v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Lisa Munn, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chelsea Vukelich v. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Barbara Amendola and Warren Amendola, as Parents and Guardians of Christopher Amendola v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Ruby Flowers, Administratrix for the Estate of Melissa J. Malone v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Joseph Rivera Matos, an Infant by His Father and Natural Guardian, Victor Rivera v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Skinner-Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019