Carman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
Ruth Carman appeals from the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Prudential Insurance Company. The superior court held that her action on a life insurance policy was barred by the ' statute of limitations. At issue is the time of commencement of the statute of limitations on a life insurance policy claim where the beneficiary relies upon the statutory presumption of death arising from the insured’s disappearance. We hold that the applicable six-year statute of limitations commences to run at the end of the period required to give rise to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Haakanson v. Wakefield Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. HicksTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Clabaugh v. BottcherAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jenkins v. DanielsAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Irby v. Fairbanks Gold Mining, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Carman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Jenkins v. DanielsAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Moncrief v. Sohio Petroleum Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.