Legal Opinion

American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Hicks

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1931No. 1205-5563PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.

The defendant in error, as the beneficiary, named in a policy issued by the plaintiff in error to her husband, Archie Hicks, for $1,-OOO, dated September 2, 1920, recovered a judgment against the plaintiff in error for $1,370, with 6 per cent, interest from the date of the judgment rendered in the district court of Orange county, upon a trial by the judge, without the intervention of a jury. Upon appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals at Beaumont, this judgment was affirmed. 19 S.W.(2d) 359.

The suit was instituted August 18,1928, substantially eight years after the issuance of the policy of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. BodenTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. American Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Nobles v. MarcusTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Exxon Corp. v. Pluff, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2002
  3. City of Dallas v. EtheridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Denman v. Citgo Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. Travis County v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API