Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1963No. 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

372 U.S. 144 (1963)

KENNEDY, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

v.

MENDOZA-MARTINEZ.

No. 2.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 10-11, 1961.

Restored to the calendar for reargument April 2, 1962.

Reargued December 4, 1962.

Decided February 18, 1963.[*]

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Bruce J. Terris reargued the cause for appellant in No. 2. J. William Doolittle reargued the cause for appellant in No. 3. On the briefs in both cases were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Oscar H. Davis, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit.

Thomas R.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Goldberg; Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MosleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Hubbard (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Shorter v. BacaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  4. Com. v. Bueno, F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. People v. MosleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API