Legal Opinion

Hindal v. Kahler Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1925No. 24,730PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Alternative writ of mandamus requiring the district court of Olmsted county to proceed with,the trial of the above entitled action or show cause why it should not do so.

From the writ and the return thereto, it appears that the action was brought in Dodge county; that the summons and complaint were served January 13, 1925; that defendant served an affidavit and demand for a change of venue to Olmsted county, where its place of business is located, on January 30, 1925, and served its answer on February 2, 1925; that plaintiff served his reply and a notice of trial on February 4, 1925, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knudsen Fruit Co. v. HornerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frank F. Pasch Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API