Legal Opinion

Knudsen Fruit Co. v. Horner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1918No. 20,978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in the district court for St. Louis county. The facts in relation to tbe application for a change of venue to Carlton county are stated at tbe beginning of the opinion. From an order, Dancer, J., striking tbe cause from tbe March calendar of the district court, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

This action was brought in St. Louis county in December, 1917. Defendant resided in Carlton county. On December 28 defendant served an affidavit and demand for a change of venue to Carlton county, under the provisions of section 7722, G. S. 1913. This demand and affidavit, with proof of service thereof upon plaintiff’s attorney, were not filed with the clerk of court of St. Louis county until February 7, 1918, or more than 30 days after the service thereof. On January 12 the following stipulation was entered into by counsel:

*60

Knudsen Eruit Company, a Corporation Plaintiff, vs. M. C. Horner,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hindal v. Kahler CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. State Ex Rel. Bondy v. RybergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API