Legal Opinion

Crossman v. Reeves

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1992No. 70564Published

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice.

Jack Alvie Crossman brought this action for specific performance of an oral life-care contract made with Ben and Mary Rea, now deceased. The trial court, after hearing Crossman’s evidence, found that no life-care contract existed and sustained a demurrer in favor of the Robertsons. The Court of Appeals, noting that Crossman’s evidence was uncontroverted, reversed the trial court’s decision that no life-care contract existed. The appellate court remanded the cause with directions that the property of the Reas be distributed to Cross-man. Having granted appellees’ petitions for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cacy v. CacySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Pancoast v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. In Re Flynn's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Renegar v. BruningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API