Legal Opinion
Van Orman v. Nelson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1969No. 8672PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOBLE, Chief Justice.
The single question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court exceeded the directions of the mandate and opinion of this court upon remand following a prior appeal in Van Orman v. Nelson, 78 N.M. 11, 427 P.2d 896.
It is firmly established in this jurisdiction that upon remand the district court has only such jurisdiction as the opinion and mandate of this court confer. Varney v. Taylor, 79 N.M. 652, 448 P.2d 164; Gruschus v. C. R. Davis Contracting Co., 77 N.M. 614, 426 P.2d 589; Wilson v. Employment Security Comm., 76 N.M. 652, 417 P.2d 455; Sproles v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Van Orman v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Varney v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Del Curto v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- Chronister Ex Rel. Chronister v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Gruschus v. CR Davis Contracting CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moffat v. Branch ex rel. VincoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Moffat v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State Ex Rel. King v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Fortuna Corp. v. Sierra Blanca Sales Co., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.