Legal Opinion
O'Neil v. American Radiator Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 7, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
The defendants American Radiator Company and American Radiator and Standard Sanitary Corporation, individually and as successor of Excelso Products Corporation, move under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the basis of the motion being that there is no showing under MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company, 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050, 1053, L.R.A.1916F, 696, Ann.Cas.l916C, 440, that a water heater was inherently dangerous and,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Rosebrock v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Genesee County Patrons Fire Relief Ass'n v. L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Cunningham v. GlauberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Muhlenberg Hospital v. Lawyers Title & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Defore v. Bourjois, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Cappello v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1951
- Ex Parte Hospital Espanol De Auxilio Mutuo De Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- National Transfer & Rigging Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Holsomback v. Alabama Organ CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.