Legal Opinion

Zacher v. Niagara Frontier Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the

contention of defendant Charlestowne Floors, Inc., and third-party defendant, Butera Carpet & Tile, Inc. (defendants) that Supreme Court erred in denying their motion for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action. The requirement that "a plaintiff must allege violation of a specific safety regulation promulgated by the Commissioner of the Department of Labor” (Foster v Spevack, 198 AD2d 892, 894; see, Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494, 505) was satisfied by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Foster v. SpevackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Bloomfield v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Misicki v. CaradonnaNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Webber v. City of DunkirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Zuniga v. Stam RealtyNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Piccolo v. St. John's Home for AgingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Martinez v. Hitachi Construction Machinery Co.New York Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API